← All authors
c. 1328 – 1384

John Wyclif

Worth knowing

  • An Oxford philosopher and theologian who argued that Scripture is the highest authority for the church and every Christian should be able to read it.
  • His followers produced the first complete Bible in English, translated from the Latin, in the 1380s.
  • The Council of Constance condemned him in 1415. In 1428 his bones were dug up, burned and thrown into the River Swift.

In Scholar’s Dream, John Wyclif has one book

Passages you can read in the game

Longer excerpts the Scriptorium holds on screen for a player to sit and read, word for word.

“Nothing is to be believed that is not founded upon this book, and to its teachings nothing is to be added.”

Wyclif, De Veritate Sacrae Scripturae, as summarised in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 41 (public domain).
from On the Truth of Holy Scripture

“Logic, as in Oxford, changes very frequently, yea, every twenty years, but the Scriptures are yea, yea and nay, nay. They never change. They stand to eternity.”

Wyclif, De Veritate Sacrae Scripturae, as summarised in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 41 (public domain).
from On the Truth of Holy Scripture

“For if I say, This is my hand, and if it be not a hand, then am I a liar…”

Wyclif, sermon on Matthew 26:26, in Grenville Kleiser, The World’s Great Sermons I (1908, public domain). (trimmed quote)
from On the Truth of Holy Scripture

“They said it in Wyclif’s day, and the hypocrites say now, that God’s Word arouseth insurrection.”

Tyndale, quoted in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 40 (public domain).
from On the Truth of Holy Scripture

Words John Wyclif’s books borrow from others

Moves these books can learn whose quotation comes from somebody else. The citation on each one names who actually said it.

“For if I say, This is my hand, and if it be not a hand, then am I a liar…”

Wyclif, sermon on Matthew 26:26, in Grenville Kleiser, The World’s Great Sermons I (1908, public domain). (trimmed quote)public domain
How it works in the game: the move This Is My Hand
BibleArgument · power 76 · 100% accurate

In the gameWords mean what they would mean in a mouth. Wyclif will not let a sentence do something in church that it could not do at a table.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 1)

“Nothing is to be believed that is not founded upon this book, and to its teachings nothing is to be added.”

Wyclif, De Veritate Sacrae Scripturae, as summarised in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 41 (public domain).public domain
How it works in the game: the move Nothing Is To Be Added
BibleArgument · power 78 · 100% accurate

In the gameThe rule Wyclif argued for a century and a half before anyone called it sola scriptura, and the rule this whole game is played by.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 8)

Strong against
×2Not In The Mother Tonguean argument · why?

If nothing may be believed but what stands in the book, then everyone who must believe has to be able to reach the book.

“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”

Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.
How it works in the game: the move Affirm
Status

In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 10)

“They said it in Wyclif’s day, and the hypocrites say now, that God’s Word arouseth insurrection.”

Tyndale, quoted in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 40 (public domain).public domain
How it works in the game: the move God’s Word Arouseth Insurrection
EcclesiologyArgument · power 80 · 100% accurate

In the gameThe oldest reason given for keeping the Bible out of ordinary hands: that people who read it will not stay quiet. Tyndale had heard it too, and answered it by naming it.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 14)

Strong against
×4Not In The Mother Tonguean argument · why?

Name the real reason and it stops sounding like care for the reader. Tyndale heard the same sentence a hundred and fifty years later and said so.

“Logic, as in Oxford, changes very frequently, yea, every twenty years, but the Scriptures are yea, yea and nay, nay. They never change. They stand to eternity.”

Wyclif, De Veritate Sacrae Scripturae, as summarised in Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church VI § 41 (public domain).public domain
How it works in the game: the move They Stand To Eternity
BibleArgument · power 82 · 100% accurate

In the gameSchools change their minds every twenty years. The text does not. Whatever is settled by a fashion can be unsettled by the next one.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 20)

Strong against
×4The Sentence of Constancean argument · why?

A council can reverse a council, and this one did. The text it was condemning has not moved.

×2.5Nothing Outside the Textan argument · why?

Schools change their minds every twenty years, and the text does not. A meaning that could be put off for ever would have moved by now. Nobody in the history of the church has read John 3:16 as a recipe.

“Wherever we see the word of God sincerely preached and heard, wherever we see the sacraments administered according to the institution of Christ, there we cannot have any doubt that the Church of God has some existence, since his promise cannot fail.”

Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion IV.1.9 (trans. Beveridge, 1845), public domain.public domain
How it works in the game: the move Where the Word Is Preached
EcclesiologyArgument · power 93 · 100% accurate

In the gameRefuses to produce a lineage, because a lineage was never the test. Look for preaching and sacraments; where you find them you have found the church, and where you do not, a list of bishops will not supply one.

Learned byOn the Truth of Holy Scripture (Lv 28)

Strong against
×4Before Lutheran argument · why?

It does not produce a lineage. It changes what would count as one — and the church turns out to have been in a great many buildings that were flying his flag.

×3.5The Charge of Schisman argument · why?

Refuses to produce a lineage, because a lineage was never the test.

×2The Sentence of Constancean argument · why?

Where the Word is preached and heard, there is a church. That is the test, and a decree is not it.

×0.5The Indulgence Stallan argument · why?

A definition of the church, aimed at a market stall. True, and nowhere near it.

Who else was alive

John Wyclif against everyone else in the game.

A.D. 450A.D. 700A.D. 950A.D. 1200A.D. 1450A.D. 1700A.D. 1950
Solid bar = firm dates · faded = approximate51 authors sit outside this window
What Would Jesus Tech

Helping Christians use tech, find rest, and glorify God.

Listen
All Episodes
Explore Topics
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
About
The Hosts
Speakers
Books
Scripture
Scholar's Dream Game
Contact
Patreon
© 2026 What Would Jesus Tech · whatwouldjesustech.com·