“All things, that exist, are either created or uncreated. If, then, things are created, it follows that they are also wholly mutable.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.3 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain).public domain
“But things that are created must be the work of some maker, and the maker cannot have been created. For if he had been created, he also must surely have been created by some one, and so on till we arrive at something uncreated.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.3 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain).public domain
Created or Uncreated
Natural TheologyArgument · power 70 · 100% accurateIn the gameA dilemma with only two doors, and one of them opens on God. Everything that exists was made or was not; whatever was made needs a maker; the regress has to stop.
“Moreover the Word must also possess Spirit. For in fact even our word is not destitute of spirit.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.7 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain). Distinct from Timothy I’s sun/light/heat: this one reasons from the arguer’s own mind rather than from the sky.public domain
The Word and the Spirit
Theology ProperArgument · power 66 · 100% accurateIn the gameYour own thinking is the analogy: a mind, the word it forms, and the breath that carries it. Faint, and not nothing.
“So then this one and only God is not Wordless. And possessing the Word, He will have it not as without a subsistence, nor as having had a beginning, nor as destined to cease to be.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.6 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain).public domain
“For there never was a time when God was not Word: but He ever possesses His own Word, begotten of Himself.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 1.6 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain). The sentence answers Arius in Arius’ own words — “there was when he was not.”public domain
God Is Not Wordless
Theology ProperArgument · power 72 · 100% accurateIn the gameReason its way toward the Trinity instead of asserting it: a God who is living and rational was never without his Word, and a Word with no beginning is not a creature.
“I do not worship matter, I worship the God of matter, who became matter for my sake, and deigned to inhabit matter, who worked out my salvation through matter.”
John of Damascus, On Holy Images 1.16 (trans. Mary H. Allies, 1898, public domain). The modern phrasing “I worship the Creator of matter” is a different, later rendering.public domain
The God of Matter
ChristologyArgument · power 74 · 95% accurateIn the gameJohn of Damascus wrote this to an emperor who was destroying images. His argument is that God took a body, and a faith embarrassed by matter has not understood what happened.
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”
Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.
In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.
“We hold that there has been a union of two perfect natures, one divine and one human… without change or confusion or alteration or difference or separation.”
John of Damascus, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith 3.3 (trans. Salmond, NPNF² 9, public domain), eliding the list of names he refuses in between.public domain
Two Perfect Natures
ChristologyArgument · power 80 · 100% accurateIn the gameChalcedon, held steady against the error on either side of it — the union that blurs the two, and the union so loose it is only an agreement.
Strong against
×2.5Summa Theologiaea book · why?
Aquinas cites John of Damascus for this teaching again and again in the Summa (III, q.2): two natures, one person.