← All books
Clement’s Corpus

Clement’s Corpus

The Works of Clement of Alexandria

Clement of Alexandria

More about Clement of Alexandria →

Argument, then discipline, then scholarship — and Clement thought they were one job.

Catch rate
Not found in the wild
Base research
214
Stat total
340

Base stats

Every stat is a checkable fact about the actual book, not a designer's mood. Bars are drawn against the highest value any book reaches.

Stamina88
Contend92
Defend78
Popularity82
Total340

Why these numbers

The game's own explanation, as a reader sees it in the backpack.

Contend 92

The Exhortation, the Instructor and the Stromata together — the argument, the discipleship and the scholarship of the first Christian school, in one hand.

Popularity 82

The whole Clement is the standard citation for how the early church read the Greeks.

Cited for this book

Clement’s three main works are the Exhortation, which argues pagans toward Christ, the Instructor, and the Stromata. The Instructor is the surprise. It is about how a Christian should eat, dress, laugh and sleep. Clement thought conversion and daily manners belonged to the same subject.

Development

A book develops as it is read — the fragment becomes the work, the work becomes the corpus.

Moves learned

By levelling up. A book that develops keeps what it knew and learns the rest on its new schedule.

LvMoveTypeCat.PwrAccPP
30A Schoolmaster to ChristRationalityArgument80100%10
30Bound to the WoodChristologyArgument8895%10
33Affirm—Status——1
34Avoid CustomAnthropologyArgument72100%10
38A Perennial RiverRationalityArgument70100%15
44The Assent of PietyFaithArgument84100%10
50Speak GreekHistoryStatus—100%5
52Incapable of DemonstrationPresuppositionArgument88100%10
60Neither Without the OtherFaithArgument92100%10
66Learn From ManChristologyArgument9495%10

The quotes behind its moves

How to read these. In Scholar’s Dream, books argue with each other. Each thing a book can do in a debate is a move, and most moves carry a real quotation — the words the book puts on the table when it uses that move.

Strong against lists the opposing books and arguments a move was written to answer. Used against one of them, it hits much harder than usual: ×2 means twice the normal force, ×4 four times. It is the game’s way of saying: this is the sentence that answers that argument. Open an entry to read why.

“Perchance, too, philosophy was given to the Greeks directly and primarily, till the Lord should call the Greeks. For this was a schoolmaster to bring ‘the Hellenic mind,’ as the law, the Hebrews, ‘to Christ.’ Philosophy, therefore, was a preparation, paving the way for him who is perfected in Christ.”

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.5 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain), quoting Galatians 3:24.public domain

A Schoolmaster to Christ

RationalityArgument · power 80 · 100% accurate

In the gamePaul calls the Law a schoolmaster that brought Israel to Christ. Clement says Greek philosophy did the same job for the Greeks — real teaching, real preparation, and never the destination.

“Sail past the song; it works death. Exert your will only, and you have overcome ruin; bound to the wood of the cross, thou shalt be freed from destruction: the word of God will be thy pilot, and the Holy Spirit will bring thee to anchor in the haven of heaven.”

Clement of Alexandria, Exhortation to the Heathen 12 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain).public domain

Bound to the Wood

ChristologyArgument · power 88 · 95% accurate

In the gameOdysseus had himself lashed to the mast to hear the Sirens and live. Clement takes the picture off Homer and hands it back: there is a mast, it is a cross, and the man tied to it comes home.

Strong against
×3Odysseya book · why?

Clement read this book and kept the picture. There is a mast, and the man tied to it comes home.

“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”

Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.

Affirm

Status

In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.

“Let us then avoid custom as we would a dangerous headland, or the threatening Charybdis, or the mythic sirens. It chokes man, turns him away from truth, leads him away from life: custom is a snare, a gulf, a pit, a mischievous winnowing fan.”

Clement of Alexandria, Exhortation to the Heathen 12 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain).public domain

Avoid Custom

AnthropologyArgument · power 72 · 100% accurate

In the gameThe strongest reason for the old gods was not an argument. It was that everyone had always done it. Clement answers the habit, because the habit is what keeps people there.

Strong against
×3Ancestral Customan argument · why?

Clement answers the habit behind the charge. Doing something because everyone always has is not a reason, and custom can lead a whole people away from the truth.

“The way of truth is therefore one. But into it, as into a perennial river, streams flow from all sides.”

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.5 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain).public domain

A Perennial River

RationalityArgument · power 70 · 100% accurate

In the gameOne way, many streams. Clement says the road to truth is single and then says that everything true the Greeks ever wrote runs into it — which is a claim about where their learning ENDS, not a claim that any road will do.

“But faith, which the Greeks disparage, deeming it futile and barbarous, is a voluntary preconception, the assent of piety — ‘the subject of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen,’ according to the divine apostle.”

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 2.2 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain), quoting Hebrews 11:1.public domain

The Assent of Piety

FaithArgument · power 84 · 100% accurate

In the gameThe Greeks called faith futile and barbarous — credulity with a foreign accent. Clement does not deny that faith comes before proof. He says what it actually is: a choice made on purpose, and the beginning of every action a man takes.

Strong against
×2.5Why I Am Not a Christianan argument · why?

Russell has faith meaning belief without evidence, and holds it beneath a grown man. Clement had the same charge from the Greeks and answered it rather than denying it: faith is a choice made before the proof, which is where every chain of reasoning has to start.

“Should one say that Knowledge is founded on demonstration by a process of reasoning, let him hear that first principles are incapable of demonstration; for they are known neither by art nor sagacity… Hence it is thought that the first cause of the universe can be apprehended by faith alone.”

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 2.4 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain). (trimmed quote)public domain

Incapable of Demonstration

PresuppositionArgument · power 88 · 100% accurate

In the gameDemand a proof for every belief and the demand eats itself: the premises a proof starts from cannot themselves be proved, or there is nothing to start from. Clement says so in the second century, and then says which first principle he is standing on.

Strong against
×2.5The Ethics of Beliefan argument · why?

Clifford wants a proof for every belief. Clement points at the premises the proof itself begins from — they cannot be proved without other premises behind them, and the rule, applied to itself, leaves nobody able to believe anything.

“Now neither is knowledge without faith, nor faith without knowledge. Nor is the Father without the Son; for the Son is with the Father. And the Son is the true teacher respecting the Father.”

Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 5.1 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain).public domain

Neither Without the Other

FaithArgument · power 92 · 100% accurate

In the gameSome in Clement’s own school had split the two — faith for the simple, knowledge for the advanced. He answers that you cannot believe in the Son without knowing who he is, or know the Father except by believing the Son who teaches him.

Strong against
×2.5Room for Beliefan argument · why?

Kant puts knowledge and faith in separate rooms and calls it a service to both. Clement had already refused the partition: believing the Son means knowing who he is, and knowing the Father means believing the Son who teaches him.

×2.5The Critique of Pure Reasona book · why?

Kant puts knowledge and faith in separate rooms and calls it a service to both. Clement had already refused the partition: believing the Son means knowing who he is, and knowing the Father means believing the Son who teaches him.

“And now the Word Himself clearly speaks to thee, shaming thy unbelief; yea, I say, the Word of God became man, that thou mayest learn from man how man may become God.”

Clement of Alexandria, Exhortation to the Heathen 1 (trans. Wilson, ANF 2, public domain).public domain

Learn From Man

ChristologyArgument · power 94 · 95% accurate

In the gameClement has just quoted Philippians 2, about the one who was in the form of God and humbled himself. The Word took what is ours so that what is his could be given to us, by grace and never by nature.

Strong against
×2.5The Life of Jesusan argument · why?

Renan keeps a beautiful Galilean and drops the divinity, and calls what is left the real man. Clement says the reason there is a man to look at is that the Word took our nature — take the divinity out and the life Renan admires has nothing behind it.

What Would Jesus Tech

Helping Christians use tech, find rest, and glorify God.

Listen
All Episodes
Explore Topics
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
About
The Hosts
Speakers
Books
Scripture
Scholar's Dream Game
Contact
Patreon
© 2026 What Would Jesus Tech · whatwouldjesustech.com·