“let us next proceed to the human race, that we may see which of them participate in the truth and which of them in error.”
Aristides, Apology 2 (trans. D. M. Kay from the Syriac, ANF 9, public domain).public domain
Which of Them Has the Truth
HistoryArgument · power 58 · 100% accurateIn the gameAristides sorts the whole human race into groups and then does the thing nobody expects: he judges each one by what it says about itself. No group is dismissed unheard, and none is excused the comparison either.
Strong against
×2.5The Many Faiths, One Realan argument · why?
Aristides did not say every people was equally right. He sorted the peoples of the world one by one, and grants each what it got right, and then asks which of them actually has the truth. He asked the question Hick sets aside.
“they shut them up together in shrines, and worship them, calling them gods, even though they have to guard them securely for fear they should be stolen by robbers. And they did not perceive that anything which acts as guard is greater than that which is guarded, and that he who makes is greater than that which is made.”
Aristides, Apology 3 (trans. D. M. Kay from the Syriac, ANF 9, public domain).public domain
Gods Under Guard
RationalityArgument · power 74 · 100% accurateIn the gameAristides walks past a temple and notices the lock. If a god has to be kept safe from thieves, the guard is stronger than the god — and the man who carved it is stronger still. A child can check this argument, which is why it has never worn out.
Strong against
×3We Will Make You More Godsan argument · why?
A god that has to be locked up against thieves is weaker than the lock — and weaker than the man who carved him.
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”
Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.
In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.
“And if there is among them any that is poor and needy, and if they have no spare food, they fast two or three days in order to supply to the needy their lack of food.”
Aristides, Apology 15 (trans. D. M. Kay from the Syriac, ANF 9, public domain).public domain
They Fast Two or Three Days
EthicsArgument · power 86 · 100% accurateIn the gameRome said Christians hated mankind. Aristides answers with a household budget: when there is nothing spare, they go without meals so that somebody else can eat. He is not arguing that the charge is unfair. He is telling the emperor what to go and look at.
Strong against
×3"Haters of Mankind"an argument · why?
Aristides answered with a household budget. When Christians had no food to spare, they fasted for two or three days so a poor neighbour could eat. People who hate mankind do not do that.
×3Why Did He Neglect Us?an argument · why?
Aristides described Christians going hungry so that strangers could eat. A God who cared for only one nation would not have taught his people to love every nation.
“And if any righteous man among them passes from the world, they rejoice and offer thanks to God; and they escort his body as if he were setting out from one place to another near.”
Aristides, Apology 15 (trans. D. M. Kay from the Syriac, ANF 9, public domain).public domain
As If Setting Out
EschatologyArgument · power 72 · 100% accurateIn the gameA funeral, described by a stranger who has been watching. They give thanks, and they walk the body out of town the way you walk a friend to the edge of the village when he is going somewhere near. The resurrection is not stated. It is in how they carry him.
“And verily, this is a new people, and there is something divine … in the midst of them.”
Aristides, Apology 16 (trans. D. M. Kay from the Syriac, ANF 9, public domain). The ellipsis marks Kay’s own parenthetical gloss on the Syriac — “(lit: a divine admixture)” — not a cut in Aristides.public domain
A New People
HistoryArgument · power 80 · 100% accurateIn the gameAristides has just spent a chapter describing how Christians live, and this is his verdict on it. He is a philosopher reporting to an emperor, and the report is that something has appeared in the world that was not there before.