“Let us forget for a little while what, in the strictest sense, constitutes the ‘offense’; which is, that the inviter claims to be God. Let us assume that he did not claim to be more than a man, and let us then consider the inviter and his invitation.”
Søren Kierkegaard, Practice in Christianity (1850), printed in Hollander’s selection as “Preparation for a Christian Life”, trans. L. M. Hollander, Selections from the Writings of Kierkegaard (University of Texas Bulletin, 1923), public domain.public domain
The Inviter Claims To Be God
ChristologyArgument · power 90 · 100% accurateIn the gameKierkegaard is looking at the invitation of Matthew 11:28, to everyone who labours and is heavy laden. Set aside the offence for a moment, he says: the offence is that the one inviting claims to be God. He will not let the invitation be admired without that claim.
×2.5The Many Faiths, One Realan argument · why?
Hick wants Jesus as one valid response among others. Kierkegaard says: set aside for a moment the offence, which is that the one who invites claims to be God, and look at the invitation. There is nothing left to look at. The claim is what the invitation stands on, and a view that gives it up has given up the invitation too.