John Henry Newman, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870)
John Henry Newman (1801–1890)
More about John Henry Newman →
Nobody waits for proof before trusting a friend. He spent twenty years asking why that is not a failure.
Every stat is a checkable fact about the actual book, not a designer's mood. Bars are drawn against the highest value any book reaches.
The game's own explanation, as a reader sees it in the backpack.
High. Twenty years of thinking about one question, and a lifetime of watching people come to believe: parishioners, students, his own family, himself.
Very high. It answers the strongest form of the objection, not a convenient one, and it never claims the evidence is better than it is.
The distinction it turns on — real assent against notional — has held up for a century and a half under people who wanted badly to break it.
Slow. Newman writes long, doubles back, and refuses a summary. Nobody has ever read it quickly.
Newman published this book in 1870, seven years before Clifford’s essay, so he was not answering Clifford directly. Newman was a Roman Catholic, a convert who lost many friends by joining Rome, and Reformed Christians do not follow him there. On how a person can rightly believe without complete proof, his book is one of the best answers in print.
By levelling up. A book that develops keeps what it knew and learns the rest on its new schedule.
| Lv | Move | Type | Cat. | Pwr | Acc | PP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Affirm | — | Status | — | — | 1 |
| 1 | Life Is for Action | Rationality | Argument | 92 | 100% | 10 |
| 1 | Random Verse | Bible | Argument | 10 | 100% | 30 |
| 34 | Chapter… | Bible | Scripture | — | — | 12 |
| 50 | The Illative Sense | Faith | Argument | 86 | 100% | 15 |
| 54 | Question the Premise | Rationality | Type shift | — | — | 10 |
| 56 | Argument from Desire | Natural Theology | Argument | 74 | 100% | 10 |
How to read these. In Scholar’s Dream, books argue with each other. Each thing a book can do in a debate is a move, and most moves carry a real quotation — the words the book puts on the table when it uses that move.
Strong against lists the opposing books and arguments a move was written to answer. Used against one of them, it hits much harder than usual: ×2 means twice the normal force, ×4 four times. It is the game’s way of saying: this is the sentence that answers that argument. Open an entry to read why.
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”
Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.
In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.
“Life is for action. If we insist on proofs for every thing, we shall never come to action: to act you must assume, and that assumption is faith.”
John Henry Newman, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870), public domain.public domain
In the gameNewman grants that certainty is rare and then asks what anybody actually does about it. Nobody waits for proof before marrying, sailing, or trusting a friend; everyone assumes far past the evidence every day, and calls it ordinary. Demand proof for everything and you do not get caution — you get paralysis.
The essay assumes a man can always suspend judgement and wait. Newman asks when — nobody has ever waited for proof before trusting a friend, and the rule would stop every life it touched!
Newman builds the Grammar of Assent on ground Butler cleared, and he quotes the Analogy on the weight of probability.
“We are in a world of facts, and we use them; for there is nothing else to use. We do not quarrel with them, but we take them as they are, and avail ourselves of what they can do for us.”
John Henry Newman, An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870), Part II ch. 9 §1 (public domain).public domain
In the gameNewman’s name for the judgement that weighs many small things at once and reaches a certainty no single one of them carries. It is how a doctor reads a patient and how anybody knows a friend is lying. Not a syllogism, and not a feeling either.
Newman reasons from many small probabilities, and he calls Butler the great master of that kind of reasoning.
“Sufficient evidence” is doing all the work and is never defined. Real certainty is reached by weighing many small things at once, which is not a sum and never was!
“He who pleads his cause first seems right; until another comes and questions him.”
Proverbs 18:17 (WEB).
In the gameChallenge the foundation of an argument before it can be pressed. Lowers the foe’s Contend.
“…is not a happy life what all will, and no one altogether wills it not?… And this is the happy life, to rejoice to Thee, of Thee, for Thee; this is it, and there is no other.”
Augustine, Confessions 10.20–23 (trans. E. B. Pusey, 1838, public domain).public domain
“the desire of the true good is naturally implanted in the minds of men; only error leads them aside out of the way in pursuit of the false.”
Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy III.2 (trans. H. R. James, 1897, public domain).public domain
In the gameNobody has to be taught to want to be happy, and nothing on offer finishes the wanting. Augustine and Boethius, a century apart, both take the permanent hunger as evidence of where the food is.
Camus grants the hunger and the silence, and calls their collision the absurd. Augustine and Lewis take the same hunger the other way. A hunger for something the world cannot supply is one of the ordinary signs that something else supplies it. Camus wrote his university thesis on Augustine.
Freud explains where the longing came from. He never asks the other question — whether a longing this specific, appearing in every culture, is evidence that it has an object.
Diotima’s ladder in the Symposium climbs from one beautiful body to all of them to beauty itself, because no particular thing ever finishes the wanting. Augustine makes that argument nearly eight centuries later and grants Plato every rung of it. What a Form cannot do is come looking for you.
Augustine found that nothing he chose could satisfy him until God changed what he loved. Grace did not only teach him. It changed his heart.
Pascal said that his account of man, wretched and great together, came from Augustine.
A duty to believe only on proof is itself believed without proof — the rule cannot pass its own test!
The specific move or chapter of Scripture that cuts through this one, and why. The number is how much harder it hits than usual — ×4 is four times the normal force.
Newman quotes Butler on this point in the Grammar of Assent: the truth of religion, like the truth of common matters, is judged by the whole evidence taken together.
Newman calls Butler the great master of this kind of reasoning, where many small probabilities add up.