The passages the Scriptorium holds on screen, word for word from a public-domain translation. Written in Greek, surviving chiefly in an ancient Latin translation.
“It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world… it is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.8 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
“So firm is the ground upon which these Gospels rest, that the very heretics themselves bear witness to them, and, starting from these documents, each one of them endeavours to establish his own peculiar doctrine.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.7 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
“For the Ebionites, who use Matthew’s Gospel only, are confuted out of this very same… But Marcion, mutilating that according to Luke, is proved to be a blasphemer of the only existing God, from those passages which he still retains.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.7 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
“Indeed, they have arrived at such a pitch of audacity, as to entitle their comparatively recent writing ‘the Gospel of Truth,’ though it agrees in nothing with the Gospels of the Apostles.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.9 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
“Wretched men indeed! who wish to be pseudo-prophets, forsooth, but who set aside the gift of prophecy from the Church.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.11.9 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
“For the glory of God is a living man; and the life of man consists in beholding God.”
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 4.20.7 (trans. Roberts & Rambaut, ANF 1, public domain).
Notes
Books 3 to 5 stop describing the gnostics and start building. Book 3 is apostolic succession and the fourfold Gospel; Book 4 is the unity of the two Testaments; Book 5 is the resurrection of the flesh and the recapitulation of all things. Written c. A.D. 180–185 and sent out a book at a time as each was finished.
The four-zones-four-winds argument will strike you as a stretch, and it is. But look past the reasoning to what it assumes: writing around A.D. 180, Irenaeus treats a four-Gospel canon as so settled that he has to explain WHY it is four, not argue THAT it is. That is the load-bearing part.
Then 3.11.7 does something better. He does not appeal to his own side — he points out that his opponents argue from these same four books. Marcion cut Luke to pieces and the pieces he kept still convict him. A hostile witness is worth more than a friendly one.
Notice he fights in both directions in a single chapter: the gnostics for adding revelation, and the Montanists for setting prophecy aside. He is not simply against whatever is new.
⚑ About that famous line at 4.20.7. You will hear it as "the glory of God is man fully alive." That is a paraphrase, not a translation — Irenaeus’ Greek is lost, and the surviving Latin (Gloria enim Dei vivens homo) has no word for "fully."
The difference is not small. The popular version sounds like advice about living intensely. Irenaeus has just quoted John on the Son revealing the invisible Father, and his actual claim is christological: the life of man is the seeing of God. It is one of the most misquoted sentences in patristics.