← All books
The God Who Is There

The God Who Is There

Francis Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (1968)

Francis Schaeffer — American pastor and founder of the L’Abri community in Switzerland

Bearded, warm, and always three questions ahead of the person he is talking to.

Catch rate
58 / 255
Base research
262
Stat total
356

Base stats

Every stat is a checkable fact about the actual book, not a designer's mood. Bars are drawn against the highest value any book reaches.

Stamina90
Contend90
Defend84
Popularity92
Total356

Why these numbers

The game's own explanation, as a reader sees it in the backpack.

Stamina 90

STAMINA — Solid. It is a book of lectures, and it moves through art, music and philosophy without losing the thread.

Contend 90

CONTEND — Solid. It presses a view toward its own conclusion, which is more patient than a direct attack.

Defend 84

DEFEND — Moderate. It gives way at the edges of its history, and holds at the centre.

Popularity 92

POPULARITY — High. It reached a generation of students who had never read theology.

Cited for this book

Francis Schaeffer ran L’Abri, a community in Switzerland where people with doubts came to argue and stay. His method was to take a person’s view seriously enough to follow it to its end, kindly and without hurry, and to let the person see where it led. His first move was never “accept Christ.” It was “God is there.”

Moves learned

By levelling up. A book that develops keeps what it knew and learns the rest on its new schedule.

LvMoveTypeCat.PwrAccPP
1Random VerseBibleArgument10100%30
1God Is ThereAnthropologyArgument90100%10
14Affirm—Status——1
26No RomanticismAnthropologyArgument86100%15
30Chapter…BibleScripture——12
38Dark for the ConsistentAnthropologyArgument84100%15
46No FoundationBibleArgument84100%15
54Taking the Roof OffAnthropologyArgument92100%10

The quotes behind its moves

How to read these. In Scholar’s Dream, books argue with each other. Each thing a book can do in a debate is a move, and most moves carry a real quotation — the words the book puts on the table when it uses that move.

Strong against lists the opposing books and arguments a move was written to answer. Used against one of them, it hits much harder than usual: ×2 means twice the normal force, ×4 four times. It is the game’s way of saying: this is the sentence that answers that argument. Open an entry to read why.

“We must never forget that the first part of the gospel is not ‘Accept Christ as Savior’ but ‘God is there.’ Only then are we ready to hear God’s solution for man’s moral dilemma in the substitutionary work of Christ.”

Francis Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (1968), pp. 162–163, as quoted by Shane Lems, The Reformed Reader Blog, “Taking the Roof Off (Francis Schaeffer)” (2018). Short excerpt from an in-copyright work, used under fair use.in copyright · fair use

God Is There

AnthropologyArgument · power 90 · 100% accurate

In the gameSchaeffer’s order for telling the gospel to a modern person. The first line is not a request to accept Christ. It is the plain claim that God is there. Nothing after it makes sense to a listener who has not heard that first.

“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”

Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.

Affirm

Status

In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.

“There is no romanticism as one seeks to move a man in the direction of honesty. On the basis of his system you are pushing him further and further towards that which is not only totally against God, but also against himself. You are pushing him out of the real universe.”

Francis Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (1968), pp. 162–163, as quoted by Shane Lems, The Reformed Reader Blog, “Taking the Roof Off (Francis Schaeffer)” (2018). Short excerpt from an in-copyright work, used under fair use.in copyright · fair use

No Romanticism

AnthropologyArgument · power 86 · 100% accurate

In the gameSchaeffer says the work is honest and it is hard, and there is nothing romantic about it. You press a person’s view toward its own conclusion until they can see where it runs out of world.

“Of course it hurts; of course it is dark in the place where a man, in order to be consistent in his non-Christian presuppositions, must deny what is there in this life and in the next.”

Francis Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (1968), pp. 162–163, as quoted by Shane Lems, The Reformed Reader Blog, “Taking the Roof Off (Francis Schaeffer)” (2018). Short excerpt from an in-copyright work, used under fair use.in copyright · fair use

Dark for the Consistent

AnthropologyArgument · power 84 · 100% accurate

In the gameThe line that explains why the previous move hurts. To be consistent in a view that has no place for God, a person must deny what is really there, in this life and the next. Schaeffer says it is dark there, and he does not enjoy saying it.

“Unless the Bible is without error, not only when it speaks of matters of salvation, but also when it speaks of history and the cosmos, we have no foundation for answering questions concerning the existence of the universe and its form and the uniqueness of man.”

Francis Schaeffer, The Great Evangelical Disaster (1984), as quoted by Louis Markos, The Gospel Coalition, “Why Francis Schaeffer Still Matters” (2026). Short excerpt from an in-copyright work, used under fair use.in copyright · fair use

No Foundation

BibleArgument · power 84 · 100% accurate

In the gameSchaeffer’s last book was a warning to his own side. If the Bible is trusted only where it talks about salvation, then it cannot answer the questions about where the world came from or what a human being is. The foundation has to be the whole book.

“The more comprehending we are as we take the roof off, the worse the man will feel if he rejects the Christian answer. In a fallen world we must be willing to face the fact that however lovingly we preach the gospel, if a man rejects it he will be miserable. It is dark out there….”

Francis Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (1968), pp. 162–163, as quoted by Shane Lems, The Reformed Reader Blog, “Taking the Roof Off (Francis Schaeffer)” (2018). Short excerpt from an in-copyright work, used under fair use.in copyright · fair use

Taking the Roof Off

AnthropologyArgument · power 92 · 100% accurate

In the gameSchaeffer’s picture of what an honest conversation does. Show a person what their own view leads to, slowly, and without pretending it is easy. It hurts, and it is meant to, because the alternative is to leave someone comfortable in a house with no roof.

Strong against
×3Nothing Outside the Textan argument · why?

Schaeffer’s method is to take a view seriously and follow it to its end, kindly and slowly. Followed to its end, the endless text is a text that cannot say so. Derrida expected every reader to understand this sentence, and that is the roof coming off.

What Would Jesus Tech

Helping Christians use tech, find rest, and glorify God.

Listen
All Episodes
Explore Topics
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
About
The Hosts
Speakers
Books
Scripture
Scholar's Dream Game
Contact
Patreon
© 2026 What Would Jesus Tech · whatwouldjesustech.com·