← All books
Freedom of the Will

Freedom of the Will

Jonathan Edwards, A Careful and Strict Enquiry into the Modern Prevailing Notions of that Freedom of Will (1754)

Jonathan Edwards — written at Stockbridge, a frontier mission town, after Northampton dismissed him

Catch rate
52 / 255
Base research
262
Stat total
352

Base stats

Every stat is a checkable fact about the actual book, not a designer's mood. Bars are drawn against the highest value any book reaches.

Stamina96
Contend94
Defend96
Popularity66
Total352

Why these numbers

The game's own explanation, as a reader sees it in the backpack.

Stamina 96

STAMINA — High. Four long parts, and he follows every objection to its end.

Contend 94

CONTEND — High. He argues from ordinary experience of choosing.

Defend 96

DEFEND — High. Philosophers have argued with it for two hundred and fifty years and still assign it.

Popularity 66

POPULARITY — Low. It is hard reading and was never meant to be anything else.

Cited for this book

Jonathan Edwards wrote Freedom of the Will in 1754. He argued that we always choose what seems best to us, so we are free to do as we please. The trouble is what we please, which is why a sinner needs a new heart.

Moves learned

By levelling up. A book that develops keeps what it knew and learns the rest on its new schedule.

LvMoveTypeCat.PwrAccPP
1Random VerseBibleArgument10100%30
18Affirm—Status——1
30Chapter…BibleScripture——12
40To Do as He PleasesSoteriologyArgument84100%12
44The Greatest Apparent GoodRationalityArgument88100%10

The quotes behind its moves

How to read these. In Scholar’s Dream, books argue with each other. Each thing a book can do in a debate is a move, and most moves carry a real quotation — the words the book puts on the table when it uses that move.

Strong against lists the opposing books and arguments a move was written to answer. Used against one of them, it hits much harder than usual: ×2 means twice the normal force, ×4 four times. It is the game’s way of saying: this is the sentence that answers that argument. Open an entry to read why.

“For in him we live, and move, and have our being. As some of your own poets have said.”

Acts 17:28 (WEB) — Paul at the Areopagus, quoting the Athenians’ own poets back to them.

Affirm

Status

In the gamePick the part of the opponent’s case that is true and affirm it. That point can no longer be used against you, and the opponent’s Defend falls sharply. It deals no damage. Affirm something false and you have only agreed with an error.

“The plain and obvious meaning of the words Freedom and Liberty, in common speech, is The power, opportunity, or advantage, that any one has, to do as he pleases.”

Jonathan Edwards, Freedom of the Will (1754), Part I §5, public domain.public domain

To Do as He Pleases

SoteriologyArgument · power 84 · 100% accurate

In the gameEdwards defines freedom the way ordinary speech does: being able to do what you want. The harder question, he says, is where the wanting comes from.

“When I say, that the will is as the greatest apparent good, or, (as I have explained it,) that volition has always for its object the thing which appears most agreeable”

Jonathan Edwards, Freedom of the Will (1754), Part I §2, public domain.public domain

The Greatest Apparent Good

RationalityArgument · power 88 · 100% accurate

In the gameEdwards argues that a person always chooses what seems best to them at that moment. So a heart that loves the wrong things will freely choose them, and needs changing itself.

Strong against
×2.5Lectures on Revivalsa book · why?

Edwards answers from inside the revival’s own tradition. A person always chooses what looks best to them, so a heart that loves the wrong things will choose them freely. It is the heart that needs changing, and it cannot change itself!

×2.5The New Measuresan argument · why?

Edwards answers from inside the revival’s own tradition. A person always chooses what looks best to them, so a heart that loves the wrong things will choose them freely. It is the heart that needs changing, and it cannot change itself!

×2Émilea book · why?

The Vicar trusts conscience to guide a free will. Edwards answers that the will always follows what seems best to the heart, so knowing the good is not the same as wanting it. The heart itself needs changing.

×2The Savoyard Vicaran argument · why?

The Vicar trusts conscience to guide a free will. Edwards answers that the will always follows what seems best to the heart, so knowing the good is not the same as wanting it. The heart itself needs changing.

What Would Jesus Tech

Helping Christians use tech, find rest, and glorify God.

Listen
All Episodes
Explore Topics
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
About
The Hosts
Speakers
Books
Scripture
Scholar's Dream Game
Contact
Patreon
© 2026 What Would Jesus Tech · whatwouldjesustech.com·