“Whether the person baptised is to be wholly immersed, and that whether once or thrice, or whether he is only to be sprinkled with water, is not of the least consequence: churches should be at liberty to adopt either, according to the diversity of climates, although it is evident that the term baptise means to immerse, and that this was the form used by the primitive Church.”
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 4, ch. 15, section 19 (trans. Henry Beveridge, public domain).public domain
Not of the Least Consequence
EcclesiologyArgument · power 66 · 100% accurateIn the gameCalvin on the mode, and he is candid. The word means to immerse and the early church immersed. Whether once or thrice, or by sprinkling, he says, is not of the least consequence, and churches should be free to decide according to the climate.
“Hence we may conclude, that everything applicable to circumcision applies also to baptism, excepting always the difference in the visible ceremony.”
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 4, ch. 16, section 4 (trans. Henry Beveridge, public domain).public domain
What Applies to Circumcision Applies to Baptism
SoteriologyArgument · power 70 · 100% accurateIn the gameCalvin’s argument for baptising infants. The promise is the same in both signs, and so is the thing signified. The only difference left is the outward ceremony, which he calls the least part of it.
“Hence it is incontrovertible, that baptism has been substituted for circumcision, and performs the same office.”
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 4, ch. 16, section 4 (trans. Henry Beveridge, public domain).public domain
Baptism Has Been Substituted for Circumcision
HistoryArgument · power 62 · 100% accurateIn the gameThe conclusion Calvin draws from that comparison. Circumcision was the Jews’ first entrance into the people of God, and baptism now does the same work for the church.